Whole Jackals (2017) Movie Online

MSM, Still Living in Propaganda- ville – Consortiumnews. Exclusive: The stakes in U.

There are many interpretations to the internet for this web marketing or similar terms such as: online marketing, internet marketing, e-marketing and others. While the idea of moving to Mars might not sound so terrible right about now, “The Space Between Us” is about a young man who’s spent all of his 16 years on the.

S.- Russia relations could not be higher – possible nuclear conflagration and the end of civilization – but the U. S. Pack journalism has always been a threat to quality reporting but now it has evolved into a self- sustaining media lifestyle in which the old motto, “there’s safety in numbers,” is borne out by the fact that being horrendously wrong, such as on Iraq’s WMD, leads to almost no accountability because so many important colleagues were wrong as well. Similarly, there has been no accountability after many mainstream journalists and commentators falsely stated as flat- fact that “all 1. U. S. Even the esteemed “Politifact” deemed the assertion “true.” But it was never true.

It was at best a needled distortion of a claim by President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper when he issued a statement last Oct. Russian meddling. Because Clapper was the chief of the U. S. Intelligence Community, his opinion morphed into a claim that it represented the consensus of all 1.

Exclusive: The stakes in U.S.-Russia relations could not be higher – possible nuclear conflagration and the end of civilization – but the U.S. There are many great activites on San Diego Metro KOA. Click here to find out all the fun you can have while being a guest at this campground. Directed by Sandy Chukhadarian. With Angelica Chitwood, Deniele Ramos Cloutier, Melissa Elena Jones, Aubrey Wakeling. Three young women seek revenge against a. HBO’s “Mommy Dead and Dearest,” premiering tonight, is constructed like a Russian nesting doll of horror, revealing something new and unexpected in the tragic.

Here is the chance to download movies from this portal backed with great security. This matchless source let you watch movies online with jet like speed. You can also. Aztec Theater is the first live historical theater in San Antonio built in 1926 which was designed by the firm of Meyer and Holler. The Theater has since been.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton began touting. However, for people who understand how the U. S. Intelligence Community works, the claim of a 1. National Intelligence Estimate (or NIE) that seeks out judgments and dissents from the various agencies. But there was no NIE regarding alleged Russian meddling and there apparently wasn’t even a formal assessment from a subset of the agencies at the time of Clapper’s statement.

President Obama did not order a publishable assessment until December – after the election – and it was not completed until Jan. Clapper’s office presented the opinions of analysts from the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency – three agencies (or four if you count the DNI’s office), not 1. Lacking Hard Evidence. The report also contained no hard evidence of a Russian “hack” and amounted to a one- sided circumstantial case at best.

However, by then, the U. S. The argument went: “How can anyone question what all 1. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (right) talks with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, with John Brennan and other national security aides present. It only involved the FBI, NSA and CIA as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

It wasn’t a full inter- agency community assessment that was coordinated among the 1. After this testimony, some of the major news organizations, which had been waving around the “1. Russian “meddling” as an established fact no longer requiring attribution or referred to the “unanimous judgment” of the Intelligence Community without citing a specific number. This “unanimous judgment” formulation was deceptive, too, because it suggested that all 1. For a regular reader of The New York Times or a frequent viewer of CNN, the distinction would almost assuredly not be detected. For more than a month after the Clapper- Brennan testimonies, there was no formal correction. A Belated Correction.

Finally, on June 2. Times’ hand was forced when White House correspondent Maggie Haberman reverted to the old formulation, mocking Trump for “still refus.

The assessment was not approved by all 1. American intelligence community.”The Associated Press ran a similar “clarification” applied to some of its fallacious reporting repeating the “1. So, you might have thought that the mainstream media was finally adjusting its reporting to conform to reality. But that would mean that one of the pillars of the Russia- gate “scandal” had crumbled, the certainty that Russia and Vladimir Putin did “meddle” in the election. The story would have to go back to square one and the major news organizations would have to begin reporting on whether or not there ever was solid evidence to support what had become a “certainty” – and there appeared to be no stomach for such soul- searching. Since pretty much all the important media figures had made the same error, it would be much easier to simply move on as if nothing had changed.

That would mean that skepticism would still be unwelcome and curious leads would not be followed. For instance, there was a head- turning reference in an otherwise typical Washington Post take- out on June 2. Russia of committing “the crime of the century.”A reference, stuck deep inside the five- page opus, said, “Some of the most critical technical intelligence on Russia came from another country, officials said. Because of the source of the material, the NSA was reluctant to view it with high confidence.”Though the Post did not identify the country, this reference suggests that more than one key element of the case for Russian culpability was based not on direct investigations by the U.

S. And why – given the extraordinary expertise of the NSA in computer hacking – is “some of the most critical technical intelligence on Russia . Anyone who questions this established conventional wisdom is still crazy and out of step. For instance, James Holmes of Esquire was stunned on Thursday when Trump at a news conference in Poland reminded the traveling press corps about the inaccurate reporting regarding the 1. Russia’s guilt.“In public, he’s still casting doubt on the intelligence community’s finding that Russia interfered in the 2. Holmes sputtered before describing Trump’s comment as a “rant.”So, if you thought that a chastened mainstream media might stop in the wake of the “1. Russia- gate business, you would have been sadly mistaken. But the problem is not just the question of whether Russia hacked into Democratic emails and slipped them to Wiki.

Leaks for publication (something that both Russia and Wiki. Leaks deny). Perhaps the larger danger is how the major U. S. John Mc. Cain. Nuland was heard in an intercepted pre- coup phone call with U.

S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt discussing who should become the new leaders and pondering how to “glue” or “midwife this thing.”Despite the clear evidence of U. S. Trump simply cannot fail to admonish Mr. Putin for Russia’s attempts to meddle in the 2. Watch New Cloverfield (2017) Online here. He must make clear the United States will not tolerate it, period. Naturally, this is a difficult issue for Mr.

Trump, who reaped the benefit of Russia’s intervention and now faces a special counsel’s investigation, but nonetheless, in his first session with Mr. Putin, the president must not hesitate to be blunt. Trump must also display determination. Russia fomented an armed uprising and seized Crimea in violation of international norms, and it continues to instigate violence in the Donbas. Trump ought to make it unmistakably clear to Mr.

Putin that the United States will not retreat from the sanctions imposed over Ukraine until the conditions of peace agreements are met.”Along the same lines, even while suggesting the value of some collaboration with Russia toward ending the war in Syria, Post columnist David Ignatius wrote in a July 5 column, “Russian- American cooperation on Syria faces a huge obstacle right now. It would legitimize a Russian regime that invaded Ukraine and meddled in U. S. There is no doubt that Russia “invaded” Ukraine; “seized” Crimea; “meddled” in U. S. Yet all these groupthinks should be subjected to skepticism, not simply treated as undeniable truths. But seeing only one side to a story is where the U.

S. Yes, it is possible that Russia was responsible for the Democratic hacks and did funnel the material to Wiki. Leaks, but evidence has so far been lacking. And, instead of presenting both sides fairly, the major media acts as if only one side deserves any respect and dissenting views must be ridiculed and condemned. In this perverted process, collectively approved versions of complex situations congeal into conventional wisdom, which simply cannot be significantly reconsidered regardless of future revelations. As offensive as this rejection of true truth- seeking may be, it also represents an extraordinary danger when mixed with the existential risk of nuclear conflagration.